|
The Southborough News
Send a
Letter to the Editor
|
||||
|
||||
|
Letter to the Editor To: Vera Kolias, Southborough Town Planner Zoning Advisory Committee of Southborough Planning Board of Southborough Southborough Historical Society From: Beverly and Chris Dantz, Marijune and Paul Delouis, Cathy and Francis Mainville, Kathryn and Daniel Marous, Susan O’Leary Hill, Emily Van Nort and Joe Mercandante, Michele and Jeff Walker, all of Southborough Date: March 1, 2010 Re: Proposed Zoning Changes to the Historical and Family Neighborhood at Lyman Street, Southborough, Massachusetts Thank you to all the members of town government who continue to actively work for our neighbors and our town. Clearly, a lot of work has gone into the proposed zoning changes posted on Southboroughtown.com. Nevertheless, many of these changes would adversely affect our town, especially our beloved Lyman Street and Hillside Avenue neighborhood. First the proposed zoning changes would reduce property values on our street and in Southborough in general. Second, the affordable housing is being distributed disproportionately and inappropriately. Finally, this proposal would decimate the historic charm and character of not just our own street, but Southborough The Proposal Would Reduce Property Values The proposed zoning will affect our property value by allowing multi family dwellings or large commercial establishments near or in our single family home neighborhood. This will immediately hurt current residents (the tax base) and reduce Southborough’s attractiveness to future residents. Multi family units and large scale commercial developments are inconsistent with the nature of our town. Ample commercial space is available on Route 9 without sacrificing the mom and pop business feel of our downtown. Forty foot height limits are likewise unlike our town character. The residents of Southborough enjoy a bucolic atmosphere and access to amenities in nearby communities. This zoning plan could sacrifice that. Lyman Street is particularly vulnerable to large construction devastating our neighborhood because of the large tract of open land at the top of the Lyman Street hill and abutting the east side of Newton Street. While this is currently beautiful wooded open land, it is owned by a well known developer who has already advanced many far reaching plans for building expansively on this property. Giving him further breadth to build anything of his choosing would surely be detrimental to the town, and especially to the residents near this property. Currently, 15 children under age 12 live in the 10 houses on Lyman Street. The proposed changes would turn our family neighborhood into a place where families live next to parking lots instead of back yards and streets would be for business traffic instead of children’s bicycles. Finally, the proposal flies in the face of the town’s Master Plan by creating permitted multi family rentals in a ‘overlay’ districts. The Master Plan calls for small multi family units in the business district only. (page 33). In conclusion, the Zoning Changes should be revised to disallow any commercial entities or large multi family residences in the vicinity of Lyman street. The Proposal Allocates Affordable Housing Unevenly Lyman Street and other ‘villages’ are illogical places to artificially encourage affordable housing. Affordable housing is obviously a worthy initiative. Presumably, our town like many others seeks to create the most pleasant kind of affordable housing for the residents that live in it. This is best accomplished by spreading affordable housing throughout the town and not by singling out a small number of currently single family neighborhoods. The Zoning Changes Propose a Scenario Which Decimates Lyman Street and Southborough’s Historic Character While this argument is applicable to many of the villages in Southborough, we would like this chance to talk about our own, much loved street. While many of our Southborough friends live in homes built after 1960 or more likely, after 1990, we feel lucky to live on one of the few older streets in town and one of the only ones to maintain its neighborhood feeling. The venerable Newton Family owned Lyman Street. As many in our town know, John and David Newton of this family came to this area, then known as Stony Brook, in the 1680s. The Newton family history is inextricably linked with the history of Southborough. Lyman Street’s most beloved resident was Marjorie Newton Spurr. Mrs. Spurr grew up on the first house on Lyman Street, built in 1899. She went on to live at various points in the grand Victorian home at 15 Lyman Street and in 1927, for the occasion of her marriage, 10 Lyman Street was built for her in the Colonial Revivial style. She moved to 12 Lyman Street for her later years. Mrs. Spurr is pictured in Fences of Stone as a volunteer for the Southborough Ground Observer Corp. during the second World War. Mrs. Newton was listed as an invaluable contributor this book, considered to be the seminal history of Southborough. There exists a 1930s era picture of Mrs. Spurr’s then infant son, Warren Spurr (now deceased), as an infant sledding down Lyman Street. We are thrilled to say that not much has changed since then. The proposed changes would allow for large scale development to occur literally in the backyard of these historic homes. Our cul de sac could be opened to commercial traffic if the open land is developed. The changes would also entice future buyers to tear down these homes and replace them with box like rental buildings. Again, this thinking is inconsistent with the Master Plan, which seeks to “encourage architectural quality and the preservation of community character,” and states, “one issue that arose consistently was that of historic preservation in the villages.” This zoning plan appears to generally protect neighborhoods of new construction but to leave the Victorians, the Colonial Revivals and the Arts and Crafts farmhouses vulnerable to becoming teardowns. Specifically, our neighbors on Hillside Avenue appear to be carved out of the proposed changes. While we agree that these are beautiful homes that should be protected (indeed, neither should they abut the proposed changes this plans calls for), we think that their own value would be affected if they were not part of a more diverse architectural landscape. Imagine the character of our town if the only protected parts of Southborough were post-1990 homes. This is the scenario the zoning plan appears to advocate.
In conclusion, we feel that this plan, while clearly the product of much thought and good intentions, would harm property values, quality affordable housing and the historic soul of Southborough. It does not take into account the wonderful nature of the neighborhoods and streets that it proposes to change, especially as relates to Lyman Street and Hillside Avenue, and we ask for extensive reconsideration of this proposal. |
||||
|
March 2, 2010
|
||||
|
March 1, 2010 Letter to the Editor OPEN LETTER TO PLANNING BOARD
RE: OPPOSITION TO ZONING CHANGES ALLOWING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING IN FAYVILLE. (THESE CHANGES WILL ALSO AFFECT OTHER VILLAGES IN SOUTHBOROUGH)
This is an open letter expressing opposition to the changes in zoning. I am in the process of buying a house in Fayville. Last week I received a copy of the proposed zoning changes from my realtor, who was very surprised by these changes and was obligated to notify me. After reading these materials, I became very concerned about my investment. I do not want my mortgage to become “underwater”. One of the e mails forwarded to me came from residents living in the "Town Center" area, who are also opposed to the zoning changes. While I support their position, my concerns are different. While they appear to be concerned more about the impact of a big expansion of the business district downtown, I am more concerned about the affect of multifamily housing on property values in Fayville. In case some of you do not have this other letter of opposition from Town Center residents, I am attaching it below, because some of our concerns overlap.
I have asked my Fayville neighbors their opinion, but found they were totally unaware of the zoning changes! In fact, they expressed surprise and concern. Therefore, I have decided to write this open letter, which seeks to make other residents aware of what is going on in Fayville, and to request their support in asking the Planning Board to withdraw the rezoning proposals.
My principal objection is the zoning changes will reduce neighborhood property values. My house is in Fayville, in a Residence B zone, which is now restricted to single family uses. The change to zoning will affect a very large area not far from my house. This area will be included in a new “Overlay District”, where new uses will be allowed. These new uses will include multifamily rental apartments, intended for lower incomes, built on smaller lots at higher density. For example: apartment buildings 3 stories high, at a density of 8 units per acre.
Another concern is the zoning change is not limited to new construction on vacant land, but also allows demolitions or conversions of existing single family houses into multiple rentals. It seems obvious that this will reduce the value of all houses within the Overlay District, as well as houses nearby. Thankfully my house is outside the Overlay District, but I still think my investment will be affected. The property values in the entire neighborhood will decline as it gradually changes from a single family area into a multifamily area.
The wording of the rezoning (below) states that the purpose is to implement the Master Plan. However, my realtor tells me that Town Meeting never voted to adopt this Plan, and few residents have seen it. Therefore, I have taken the trouble to read this Plan, in an attempt to understand what is driving these zoning changes.
What stands out from reading the Master Plan is that the proposed changes to zoning do not follow what the Plan recommends. This same issue is mentioned in the opposition letter from the residents living in the Town Center Village. I found these residents are correct. One way to make this more clear is to quote directly from the Plan, with page numbers.
The Plan suggests that multifamily housing be considered inside the Village Business zones, but not in the surrounding Village residential areas located outside the business zone. In contrast, the rezoning allows multifamily rentals in the residential areas OUTSIDE the Business zone. This contradicts the Plan recommendations. For proof of this, read the direct quotations below, specifically pages 214, 215.
Also, nowhere in the Master Plan could I find any mention of an “Overlay” zone covering all the villages.
Also, the Plan recommends that any multifamily housing be kept “small” and be limited to 2 stories, so that it “preserves” the existing Village character. This makes sense, as I cannot find any 3 storey buildings in Fayville. The Village Hall is 2 stories, as is most of the existing housing “downtown” (such as the senior housing complex on Boston Rd ). However, the proposed rezoning will allow large buildings, with 6 rental units per building, and 3 stories high. This is another violation of the Plan recommendations. Proof? Read the quote below on page 33.
The following quotations from the Master Plan can be contrasted against the new zoning proposals.
QUOTATIONS FROM MASTER PLAN - CONCERNING “VILLAGES”.
Page 3. “The Vision of this Master Plan is to preserve Southborough’s classic rural New England character and charm …safeguarding its unique identity.”
Page 4. “Establish stewardship and preservation of the unique identity of Southborough’s neighborhoods and villages…”
Page 33. “Allow SMALL multi-family dwellings in the BUSINESS village District…”
Page 141. “Encourage architectural quality and the preservation of community character.”
Page 143. Consider “National Register Neighborhood Historic Districts” in the Villages.
Page 201. “One issue that arose consistently was that of historic preservation in the villages.”
Page 210. “Objectives for Fayville. - Preserve older buildings and historic village feel. - Create a village feel with buildings reflecting the local vernacular …by design guidelines”.
Page 214-215. Goals and Recommendations for all Villages. “To provide more foot traffic and encourage appropriate scale and design in the Business Village District: - Allow small multi-family dwellings in the Business Village District”. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABOVE ARE QUOTES FROM THE MASTER PLAN. BELOW ARE QUOTES FROM THE REZONING WHICH CREATES A NEW “OVERLAY DISTRICT” ALLOWING MULTIFAMILY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Purposes. The purposes of the Village Overlay District (VOD) are to: - Implement the goals and policies of the Southborough Master Plan with respect to ...affordable housing.
B. Applicability. The Village Overlay District consists of four sub-districts as shown on the Zoning Map of the Town of Southborough. In the VOD, all requirements of the underlying district shall remain in effect except where these regulations provide an alternative to such requirements, in which case these regulations shall supersede… .
C. The following uses are permitted in all sub-districts of the VOD. - Single-family dwelling. - Accessory uses: Accessory apartment, Home occupations…
D. The Planning Board may grant a special permit for the following uses: - Two-family dwelling. - Townhouses or rowhouses, not exceeding five units per building. - Multi-family dwellings, not exceeding six units per building.
E. Dimensional and density requirements. The dimensional regulations of the underlying district shall apply in the VOD except …(that) the Planning Board may grant a special permit to reduce the minimum dimensions in the Village Overlay District in accordance with the following table.
Town Center Fayville Cordaville Southville
Minimum lot area (sq. ft.) 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Minimum frontage (ft.) 60 80 80 80 Minimum front setbacks 10 10 10 10
*These dimensional requirements shall apply to single-family and two-family dwellings.
♦ Supplemental regulations for multi-family dwellings: - The minimum land area per unit shall be one unit per 5,000 square feet in the Town Center Sub-District and one unit per 7,500 square feet in all other sub-districts. - The minimum lot frontage shall be eighty (80) feet. - The minimum front setback shall be fifteen (15) feet - The maximum height of a multi-family dwelling shall be three (3) stories and forty (40) feet.
(* 5,000 sf of land per unit is equal to a density of 8 .5 units an acre.) ( The existing min lot area is 20,000 sf for a single home, which could now change to 4 units.). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE ABOVE QUOTES COME FROM THE PROPOSED REZONING.
I HOPE THIS LETTER MAKES FAYVILLE RESIDENTS MORE AWARE OF WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED, AND HOW IT COULD AFFECT THEIR PROPERTY VALUES. PLEASE COME TO THE PUBLIC REVIEW MEETING, SCHEDULED FOR NEXT WEDNESDAY, MARCH 3RD, AT 7.30 PM, AT CORDAVILLE HALL (senior center) ON RT 85. The full text and maps are on the official town web site www.Southboroughtown.com. Look under “Latest news”, then under “2008 Comprehensive zoning bylaw update”. For Master Plan, click on “2008 Master Plan”. For new zoning changes, click on “Town bylaw and planning regulations”, then click on “Villages”. The map for Fayville is also under "Villages". The only material not available from the town web site is the letter of opposition from residents of "Town Center Village", which I am attaching below. Larry Cain Southborough, MA Editor's note - since the original zoning letter sent to the planning board from the residents of the town center was not sent directly to the Southborough News I will check to see if it will be alright to post it here. |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Nov.8, 2008 Dear Editor, |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Nov.2, 2008 For Dykema Letter to the Editor DYKEMA KNOWS HOW TO GET THINGS DONE A little more than 5 years ago, when I was in my first term on the Holliston Planning Board, Carolyn Dykema decided to run for a seat on the Planning Board. During her campaign, she talked about the importance of long-term planning, understanding the needs of the town and bringing all parties to the table in order to make good policy decisions. I was struck by her energy, her balanced approach and her recognition of the importance of collaboration. After being elected to the Board, Carolyn showed herself to be a very quick study. Because of a handful of 40B applications, Carolyn determined that the town needed to regain a measure of control in affordable housing decisions and she decided to draft an Inclusionary Zoning bylaw. A few years earlier, I had a similar interest and with Barbara Gardner and our town planner we drafted an Inclusionary Zoning bylaw. But the process of advancing this particular bylaw was complicated and we looked to other, less complex measures to address Holliston’s affordable housing problem and 40B dilemma. I thought Carolyn’s effort would end in a similar way. To say that I underestimated her is an extraordinary understatement. Like all of us Carolyn was working, raising a family and diligently attending to the regular business of the Planning Board. But in her “spare time” she managed to talk to several officials in other towns that had drafted Inclusionary Zoning bylaws to understand their experience. She talked to experts in affordable housing to fully understand the legal and practical issues involved. Then she and our town planner carefully crafted a bylaw. Carolyn intuitively understood the political and practical dynamics of such a bylaw. She would need to bring all parties to the table and also conduct a public education effort to introduce this complex proposal. She went to the developer, engineering and legal communities who regularly worked on projects in Holliston because she knew that they had concerns about such zoning changes. She had several meetings and work sessions where they made changes to the bylaw that improved it rather than gutted it. She met with several Holliston residents, submitted a publicly explained the bylaw and answered many questions and contacted local media to explain the bylaw. After a public hearing the Planning Board adopted the bylaw and at the next Town Meeting, Carolyn presented it to the Town. Her public education effort and collaboration with all parties was so thorough and effective that Holliston adopted the bylaw that just a few years earlier most people did not believe possible. I have read dozens of letters supporting Carolyn over the past several weeks. Most of them talk about her leadership, energy, intelligence and compassion. They are all true; Carolyn is all of these things. But she also knows the nuts and bolts of creating good policy and moving it through the process. Her local knowledge and common sense will make Carolyn Dykema incredibly effective in advancing sound public policy that will benefit her constituents and make us proud. I encourage you to join me in voting for the most qualified and experienced candidate in this race – Carolyn Dykema. Len Engel Holliston Planning Board |
||||
|
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Nov.1, 2008 For Haley
I am a 4 term Selectman in Holliston, currently
serving in my 10th year. I have also served on the Holliston Finance
Committee, Golf Course Advisory Committee, Sewer Study Committee and
numerous other joint bodies. I have been a member of the Holliston Lions
club for 13 years and a member of Celebrate Holliston for over decade, while
serving as this year's chairman. I also served 3 terms as Chairman of the
495 Metrowest Corridor Partnership, the Arc of Innovation, where as
Municipal co-chair, I represented 31 cities and towns. |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Nov.1, 2008 For Haley Dear Editor: For years our state has been jokingly called “Taxachusetts,” but in today’s economy, this is not a laughing matter. People are fed up with the state government constantly reaching into our wallets to fund their programs, pensions, and inefficiencies. Massachusetts families are worried about their financial future, with rising costs, a housing crisis, and the markets in turmoil. The last thing we need is a State legislature even more arrogant and less accountable to the people than it already is. This is why it is crucial to elect DAN HALEY as our Representative to the 8th Middlesex District. Dan Haley will help to bring balance and accountability to Beacon Hill. He is a crusader for lowering taxes, cutting wasteful spending, eliminating turnpike tolls, and fighting for transparency in state government. Dan also is committed to keeping jobs in Massachusetts and recognizes that we cannot continue to drive employers away with exorbitant costs for doing business here. Dan Haley knows how to get things done – he knows the workings of Beacon Hill, and he is already a proven legislative leader, crafting important legislation, Melanie’s Law, and working effectively with both parties at the State House. I give my heartfelt endorsement to Dan Haley, to not only fill the position of State Representative Paul Loscocco, but to follow in his footsteps, continuing to bring to the 8th Middlesex District strong, balanced, fiscally responsible leadership. Sincerely, Claire B. Wright Hopkinton, MA |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Nov.1, 2008 For Haley As a frequent reader of many of the local internet news providers, I find myself compelled to join the discussion regarding who might best represent the citizens of the Eighth Middlesex District. I enter the discussion with what I believe are two obvious biases. First, I have been a member of the Holliston Republican Town Committee and would describe myself as moderately conservative. Second, I have had the privilege to know Carolyn Dykema and can easily affirm the many positive characteristics that have been ascribed to her. The Eighth Middlesex has been the fortunate beneficiary for the past eight years of the largely non-partisan politics of Republican Paul Loscocco, and prior to him, those of Democrat Barbara Gardner. I would hope and expect that the winner of Tuesday’s election would continue this approach. I am supporting Dan Haley in this election because I believe he is the candidate most capable of bringing the message of the Eighth Middlesex to Beacon Hill. He is articulate, informed and experienced. If necessary, he has the personal strength and integrity to take on the Beacon Hill elite, and to defy their “Go along to get along” mantra. As Representative Gardner has indicated, each district is uniquely different. I believe that our District deserves to be represented by the voice that is best able to address these unique needs, and convert them into positive gains for our community. The independent endorsements and local debates indicate that Dan Haley is that voice, and that is why he will earn my vote next Tuesday. John Shannahan Holliston |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 31, 2008 For Haley Dear Editor: I am endorsing Dan Haley as our State Representative. I have been impressed with his knowledge of the issues that face the state and local government over the next several years. Dan shows a willingness to listen to divergent points of view and to explain his stance on issues even when they don’t agree with yours. A clear sign that he is not just looking for your vote but looking to do the right thing. His intelligence, compassion and willingness to go out of his way and follow through on promises have convinced me that he is the right person to follow Paul Loscocco and represent the 8th district. Please join me in voting for Dan Haley for State Representative on November 4th. Sincerely, Henry R. Kunicki Hopkinton, MA |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 31, 2008 Prayers needed Dear Editor, My brother John Hubley is in critical care in the hospital. our family is well known in this community as John himself was a town employee for many years before stepping down from his position as the town’s fire and police dispatcher. I have received many phone calls from residents in and out of town asking about his well being and letting me know that their prayers are with him and our family. I would like to thank all of you that are praying for him and ask that you continue to pray as he needs that now more than ever. If you have never had the privilege of knowing my brother I would ask please pray anyway as his life suspends between GOD’S home and ours. Donna Hubley Harrington Southborough |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 31, 2008 For Dykema I have known Carolyn Dykema for a number of years and I am so impressed with her intelligent, caring and honest work ethic. Isn’t that what everyone in the 8th Middlesex District is looking for? You can believe that Carolyn will take the time to look at an issue, gather information from all sides and make an intelligent, well-informed decision. She does not blurt out sound bites that sell. She does not blurt out political speak. It seems to be easier for some candidates to pick an issue that might be popular in order to score political points. Carolyn recognizes, from her years in the private sector, that nothing comes for free and good public policy is rarely easy. She understands that long-term solutions are difficult to create and often very hard to explain but they are the only way to address the serious economic problems we are in today. What we as voters realize is that we want leaders who have experience and are dedicated to our communities. We want a representative who puts us first; someone who will put their full-time energy into representing our interests. We have enough politicians on Beacon Hill. Please join me in voting for a thoughtful, principled leader to represent us on Beacon Hill. Please vote for Carolyn Dykema on November 4th. . Jan McDevitt – Co-Chairperson, Community Preservation Committee – Holliston Holliston MA |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 30, 2008 For Dykema To the editor There are two good reasons two vote for Carolyn Dykema on Tuesday November 4th. In the first instance by background, training and the testimony of her own activism Carolyn will be a good shepherd for the environmental issues that now occupy so large a part of our concerns. The second reason is a comparison of her good judgment and her opponent’s attraction to the reckless cause of Question One, the mostly hare-brained scheme to abolish the state income tax. Carolyn advocates prudent management of our budget in hard times. Her opponent apparently is unable to tell the difference between the baby and the bathwater. Robert Ross Southborough |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 30, 2008 For Haley Dear Editor,I plan to vote for Dan Haley as our next State Representative. Like many of you, I am a registered unenrolled voter who votes the person, not the party. I did not know Dan very well until this past summer when I began to hear more about his run for State Representative. I began to study each candidate with more interest and decided to learn more about what Dan stood for. He was very willing to meet me at Coffee Haven where we spent some time talking about his political views and the issues facing our district. I worked closely with outgoing State Representative Paul Loscocco when he ran for office because I greatly admired his honesty, intelligence, and independent thinking. I wasn't sure where Dan stood with Paul on issues or if Dan was more "right leaning" - he's not. As our discussion progressed, I was convinced that he would be a great State Representative. Like many of my friends and neighbors, I'm concerned about higher taxes, school quality, and safety in our communities. I do not tend to support candidates who are beholden to unions or interest groups. I admire Dan's sincerity and careful consideration of the important issues our district faces. My time with Dan then, and since then has convinced me that we need someone like him now to express that independent and thoughtful perspective. I've never written to a newspaper or organization to support a candidate but after reading recent character descriptions from others, I felt compelled to share my own view. Dan is a moderate Republican who has the experience to serve us without any connections to groups that will trump my interest. I feel that he is an honest, intelligent and sincere person, who in the same spirit of my friend Paul Loscocco, will see government through my eyes. This unenrolled voter will be voting for Dan Haley on November 4, I hope you will too. Sincerely, Denise R. Cronin Holliston, MA |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 30, 2008 For Dykema
To the editor:
Southborough, MA |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 30, 2008 For Eldridge To the editor I want to share with my neighbors the reasons I am voting for James Eldridge for State Senator on Nov. 4th. As an activist and then a State Rep Jamie Elbridge has proved his commitment to progressive policies, quality education, health care for all and environmental policies that work. And he has good judgment. That matters in hard times when unpredictable issues may arise. By contrast, his opponent Steve Levy has waffled back and forth about Question One, which would cut 40% of the state budget. That is what a prudent person would call a clear case of reckless disregard for sound management. Jamie Eldridge is a candidate whose record inspires confidence. Robert Ross Southborough |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 30, 2008 For Dykema To the Editor: Carolyn Dykema is the candidate for Representative in the 8th Middlesex District that I will confidently vote for on November 4th. As a retired high school teacher who still has a deep and abiding interest in our public school system I have found Carolyn ’s commitment to public education, coupled with her leadership on other civic issues, to be both reassuring and praiseworthy.I was particularly pleased and proud when I learned that my Massachusetts Teacher ’s Association which has been a strong advocate for Public Education since 1845 has endorsed Carolyn candidacy.The citizens of the Holliston, Hopkinton, Medway, Southborough and Westborough will be well served when we elect Carolyn to be our State Representative. Bill Dooling Holliston, MA 01746 |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 30, 2008 For Haley I am a public educator of 30 years who is writing to offer my enthusiastic endorsement of Dan Haley for State Representative of the 8th Middlesex District. We need to elect someone who understands the working of the state house yet is not tied to a special interest group. I feel that Dan Haley is that candidate. This year's race is important for our district. We face bleak financial times both locally and nationally. I want to elect someone who will keep educators interests foremost and ensure our Legislature is held accountable for the tax dollars they spend. Please join me and vote for Dan Haley on November 4th, our district needs a strong, independent, and intelligent voice on Beacon Hill watching out for us! Karen Waters Paulin Westborough |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor -Oct. 30, 2008 For Eldridge
As a former State Senator for the Middlesex &
Worcester District and Environmental Secretary of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, as well as a district resident, I enthusiastically endorse
Jamie Eldridge to be our next State Senator. |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct. 29, 2008 For Haley
Editor, |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct. 29, 2008 For Haley Dear Editor, As a Democrat and a resident of the 8th Middlesex District, I am writing to express unequivocal support for Dan Haley for State Representative. I have known Dan for 15 years, and for every day of every one of those years, Dan has been one of the best friends a person could hope to have. I have total confidence that Dan will deliver to the voters of this District the kind of loyalty, commitment, integrity, enthusiasm and heart that he demonstrates as a father, husband, son, and friend. Dan is the guy everyone loves; he is always happy, cheerful and fun to be around. Dan is the guy who people call when they need help; he is the one who would give his friends the shirt off of his back. He is that friend who can be relied on for anything, at any time. He gives of himself unconditionally because that is simply who he is – a person who seeks to make things easier for those around him without any expectation of getting something in return. Dan is a person of the highest integrity and moral character. He is one of the finest, most decent people I have ever known. Dan is highly principled, with a strong sense of right and wrong and an energetic personality that endears him to anyone who meets him. In addition, he possesses a hard-work ethic that is exceeded by no one. As his friend Paul Loscocco has done, Dan will give the people of the 8th Middlesex District representation that is vested in their best interest, and of which they can be proud. More than at any other time in history, our nation and our state are at a historical crossroads. We will either get it right, or we will get it wrong. Dan Haley will help us get it right. He will help to restore integrity to the legislative process on Beacon Hill; he will protect us from increased costs and indirect taxes, such as an increase in the tolls, when there are alternative spending reforms that can be made to spare the taxpayers’ wallets; and he will respect the voice of his constituents and the right of his constituents to observe and access the political process. Dan will serve with a passion for making government work better for the people of this District. Dan will take to heart the best interests of the people of this District, and he will seek to protect those interests every day because he cares so much about the place he, and his family for generations before him, have called home. These qualities will make him a strong, compelling voice for our District just at a time when our state legislative process needs that voice most. As many people know, children are often excellent judges of character because they perceive the unvarnished truth about those whom they encounter. It was, thus, incredibly telling for me when I asked my daughter what she loved most about Dan, and she replied: “He plays with me and tells good jokes. And he gives good hugs...And, don’t forget mom, he is kind and friendly.” Although I tried, I could not have said it better myself. As a mother of two, a resident of the 8th Middlesex District, and a life-long, die-hard Democrat, I know with absolute certainty that Dan Haley is the best choice to represent the residents of this District. You will rarely find a person more kind, more decent, more caring or more real than Dan Haley. I trust him with my vote. I trust him to do what is right by all of us because he is a person who lives a life of principle, and who is of the highest character. I am certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt that, if honored with the chance, he will tirelessly serve the people of this District every day with diligence, honesty, integrity and passion. I urge all voters – Democrats, Republicans and Independents – to join me in voting for Dan Haley on November 4th. Sincerely, Trystan Phifer O’Leary Holliston, MA |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct. 29, 2008 For Vigeant
|
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct. 29, 2008 For Haley
Dear Editor, |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct 28, 2008 - For Dykema I have been waiting for a long time to endorse a candidate for State Representative that I believe is the right combination of intelligence, independence, forthrightness and good judgment. I am delighted to support Carolyn Dykema as our next State Representative to the Massachusetts Legislature. I have known Carolyn for many years as a fellow member of my church and as an active, engaged, and committed citizen in my hometown of Holliston. She and I have interacted on issues as diverse as sewer/septic management and affordable housing as well as volunteer activities. In every single instance, I’ve been struck with her willingness to get into the trenches to see that an article passes at Town Meeting, to build consensus on some thorny issue, and to bring people together so they feel listened to and enabled. Those are the skills that are necessary to build relationships across the 200 member disparate Massachusetts Legislature. Each member represents a district that is uniquely different than one’s own. It takes sensitivity, respect for the other members, and give and take to win on issues that matter to our region. The message that needs to be sent is not about partisanship, the super majority, how few Republicans serve or even positions on ballot questions. It’s about the person – their judgement, their life experience, their honesty, their willingness to lay it on the line, their desire to actively and passionately fight in the trenches with superior judgment and a caring attitude for you and your towns. Based on that criteria, Carolyn Dykema can have a huge impact on her own party and the loyal opposition, our communities and our state. I am profoundly proud to support someone of her caliber and ask you to vote for her on November 4. Cordially, Barbara Gardner Former State Representative Holliston, MA. |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct. 28, 2008 - For Haley Dan Haley is my choice to succeed Paul Loscocco as State Representative for the 8th Middlesex District. Dan will provide a strong, independent voice in the Legislature to control state spending on wasteful programs and to focus resources on local aid, public education, and policies that encourage local business development and job growth. With experience working in the Governor’s office, Dan has first-hand knowledge of how state government works. He won’t be on a learning curve, nor will he be beholden to the power brokers on Beacon Hill. Dan knows how to navigate the political crosscurrents to get things done and he will stand up for what’s important and what’s right for our district. I have been a member of the Hopkinton School Committee for the past eleven years and counting. During this time, I have been a strong advocate for public education as the best investment that a community can make, and I have pushed hard for efficiency in how local government spends taxpayers’ money. I have gotten to know Dan Haley over the past several months, and I am certain that he will fight for responsible, prioritized spending at the state level and will champion funding for our pubic schools as his top spending priority. Dan is also committed to fostering responsible local business development as a way to lighten the tax burden on homeowners. Dan will build on the legacy of Paul Loscocco and continue to have state government make a difference in the lives of everyday folks. If you want strong schools, responsible state spending, and intelligent business development, I urge you to vote for Dan Haley for State Representative. Sincerely, Phil Totino Hopkinton |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct. 28, 2008 - For Dykema
Dear Editor, |
||||
|
Letters to the Editor Oct 27, 2008 - For Levy The man I know best
On November 4th, voters of this district will choose a new State Senator. I know from personal experience the best candidate is Steven Levy. I know this because I married him. And I want to tell you about the real Steven Levy, the man I know better than anyone.
Steven constantly amazes me. Operating an accounting practice is demanding. Yet he still has time for his family, his community and, of course, his City Council duties. If I had to choose one word to describe him, it would be “passionate”, and this passion shows in everything he does.
I could not ask for a better husband or father for our children. He is loving, devoted and actively involved, helping with homework and being there for soccer games and piano recitals. What a wonderful role model for our girls to learn about integrity, hard work, and charity.
Steven has a big heart and gives back so much to our community. Whether it’s teaching Sunday School, supporting the Senior Center, hosting a Halloween food drive for the food pantry, or supporting a non-profit addiction program, Steven is as comfortable painting a wall as negotiating a contract. This sense of sharing and giving back was learned early in life from the help his family received in their time of need.
I have never known anyone who works as hard as Steven. He is a perfectionist to a fault and his own worst critic. But this only drives him to work harder and more diligently. It is not uncommon for him to work in his downstairs office until 2 or 3 AM and then be up at 5:30 to start all over again.
As City Councilor, he has used his professional experience to be a voice of fiscal responsibility and to position the city for both good times and bad. He has been a strong advocate for making government more efficient and has continually supported investments in education, public safety and economic growth for the city. I have always admired how he works to understand all sides of an issue to make a well-informed decision.
The issue I am most proud of, though, has been Steven’s commitment to protecting children. I’ve never seen anyone take so personally the news of a missing, abused or a murdered child. He probably thinks I don’t see the tears welling up in his eyes when he turns his face away after hearing such a story on the news. But I see. And I see the frustration he harbors when judges fail to sentence sex offenders to serious jail time. It’s no wonder he has made passing Jessica’s law and fixing our sex offender laws a top priority.
I'm proud of my husband. And I’m proud of his desire to represent the Middlesex & Worcester district in the State Senate. He is a good man with a deep sense of fairness, integrity, and honor. I ask you to join me in voting for Steven Levy for State Senate.
Sharon Levy, Marlborough |
||||
|
Letters to the Editor Oct. 27, 2008 - For Haley I am pleased to support Dan Haley for our next State Representative to the Massachusetts Legislature. Dan is an extremely bright, capable, and energetic person who will work tirelessly to represent the interests of all our communities with integrity and independence. I have gotten to know Dan quite well over the past several years, and he will be a welcome addition to the Massachusetts Legislature. As a person of ideas and tremendous governmental and professional experience, Dan is already well-respected by legislators of both political parties and has what it takes to effectively represent our District and make a meaningful difference from his first day in office. Electing Dan Haley to represent you at the State House will help to promote good government in Massachusetts. Of 160 Representatives in the Legislature, approximately 141 are Democrats – a situation unhealthy for our two-party system. It takes 16 Representatives to require a “roll call” vote on any measure – and with only 19 Republicans in the House, voters are perilously close to losing the only means we all have to ensure legislators face individual accountability. Under the current regime only a Republican like Dan can provide truly independent representation and stand up for your interests: any freshman Democrat (no matter how well intentioned) now faces tremendous pressure “to go along to get along” and must “toe the party line” to advance. This election is not about partisan politics. With the worsening State budget crisis - and entrenched special interests at risk - now more than ever you need an effective, capable Representative with the experience, integrity, and independence to watch out for your interests and voice your concerns. I am confident that Dan will provide independent, thoughtful representation for our District - always examining both sides of every issue substantively and working well with all people regardless of party affiliation to get the job done. I am proud to offer my full support to Dan and look forward to him serving as our next State Representative. Rep. Paul Loscocco Holliston |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct 27, 2008 - For Dykema I have known Carolyn Dykema, who is running for State Representative 8th Middlesex District, for more than 10 years. In all these years, I have seen her work incredibly hard at everything she has committed herself to, from local government to volunteering in the schools. When news of Hurricane Katrina reached her, Carolyn was quick to join efforts to organize volunteers to send relief. She truly values this community and appreciates the potential this district has for economic growth. One of the reasons Carolyn wants to run for State Representative is that she knows she will dedicate herself to the position full-time, which means working full-time towards the best interests for our district. It also means that she will keep us informed of current legislation and issues at the State House regularly, and she will be readily available to listen to concerns and new ideas of those in the district. I have seen Carolyn’s unique ability to avoid finger-pointing when problems arise. Instead, she is always looking to create solutions and engage others to work together to solve problems and realize new ideas and opportunities. She truly listens, hears, and understands people’s concerns and thoughts, and I have seen the positive results this characteristic brings. I think her years of experience in local government, local business, and her involvement in the community and district will earn her respect at the State House, and enable her to productively represent this district. I will vote for leadership, positive attitude, constructive ideas, dedication to community, and outstanding morals on November 4th. I will vote for Carolyn Dykema, and I encourage you to do the same. Tara Hathaway Holliston |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct 23, 2008 - For Dykema Dear Friends, I am writing to ask for your help. During my time in the State Senate, Massachusetts has made great strides towards recognizing the importance of the MetroWest—now the fastest growing area of the state—and providing it with the resources that it needs and the fairness it deserves. We’ve also made great strides as a Commonwealth in the areas of health care, green energy, transportation and education funding reform. But there is still more work to be done. These are challenging times which may become even more challenging as we face budget cuts and a national economic downturn. It is going to take a strong, forward-thinking legislative team to represent our interests and continue to fight for our communities. That is why I ask you to support Carolyn Dykema for State Representative in the 8th Middlesex district. Carolyn will work full time with me on the issues that matter to us, including education, the economy, transportation and infrastructure, and the environment. She is a collaborator who helps bring people together to tackle complex challenges and get things done. She has demonstrated experience working at both the state and local levels of government, and has proven her commitment to our towns with years of community service. Carolyn Dykema is committed to the issue that I care about deeply: helping the MetroWest to grow smart and grow strong. Together, Carolyn Dykema and I will work hard to advocate for our towns and our residents. Please send Carolyn Dykema to Beacon Hill with me so that we can work for you! Senator Karen Spilka 2nd Middlesex and Norfolk District
|
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Oct 23, 2008 October 23, 2008 An Open Letter from Dan Haley to the Voters of the 8th Middlesex District Dear Voters, Recently my opponent and her supporters have begun to mischaracterize my position on Question One, in these pages and elsewhere. This is an important issue, and it is my intention here to explain my position, as I have in each of our last two debates. Video of those debates, complete and un-cut, may be viewed at my website (www.danhaley2008.com), and I urge you as engaged voters to watch and evaluate our positions for yourselves. Question One has not been an issue that I have emphasized. I am running to deal with the state’s dire economic situation as it is. We have very real, very serious fiscal problems. I do not think this campaign should be about the hypothetical consequences of a measure that may or may not pass, and that in my view has little to no prospect of being implemented even if it should pass. More on the latter in a moment. I am glad that my opponent has chosen to make taxes and spending a central issue in this late stage of our campaign. We have very significant differences on taxes, aside from Question One. As our families struggle to make ends meet, she supports expanding Pike tolls and is open to a gas tax hike. She frequently references a need for “new revenues,” well-known Beacon Hill code for “new taxes.” I will continue to insist that the legislature get its spending house in order, and I will stand up against any legislative attempts to again come for our wallets. Of course I do not support de-funding local services, including public education. I am a product of the Holliston Public Schools myself, and my infant daughter will follow me through that system. From the beginning of this campaign, funding for public education has been a central issue for me. I am appalled that following a year when our legislature took in a spent a billion dollar surplus, our towns find themselves having to pit neighbor against neighbor in 2-1/2 override votes to fund basic services like school buses. That represents a fundamental failure by our legislature to set and fund true priorities. It is also part of the state of affairs that has significant numbers of voters fed up and looking to send a strong message to our legislature. A couple of weeks ago I was asked the direct question: “Will you, as a voter, vote for Question One?” I answered that direct question honestly and forthrightly, as I answer every question. I do intend to vote for Question One. I have not campaigned on the issue, and I have not encouraged others to vote for or against the measure, but I intend to vote for it myself. Given that response, it is fair for my opponent to claim that I “support” Question One, even if perhaps she and her supporters are guilty of exaggerating the degree of that support for their own purposes. That is politics, and about that I have no complaint. Let us be clear, however, both about the nature of my support and the context in which this ballot measure arose. Much of the recent coverage of Question One has focused exclusively on the potential consequences of the measure, should it pass and be allowed to go into effect. Very little attention has been paid to the events that gave birth to the initiative, or to the reasons behind the fact that in recent polls fully fifty percent or more of the voters support the measure. Question One did not arise in a vacuum. In the year 2000 the people put a related measure on the ballot, to take the much less radical step of reducing the income tax rate from 5.75% to 5.0%. That measure passed with a significant margin – and by a large majority in our district. In response, our legislature thumbed its nose at the voters, immediately passing a new law to trump the law enacted by the people. Eight years later the will of the voters has still not been implemented; our income tax rate has not been reduced to 5.0%. The legislature does not have (or is not supposed to have) a role in the ballot initiative process – they do not have a veto. Our legislature, however, in 2000 saw fit to inject itself into the constitutional process in a very extra-constitutional way, with the result being that the voice of the people was stifled. Fast forward to today, and here we are with a billion-plus dollar deficit just ten months after a year when the Commonwealth collected more tax revenue than in any prior year in our history. Last year our state government took in a billion dollars more than they expected. Given the opportunity to vote on a bill that would have sent those surplus dollars back to our local communities – a measure that would have resulted in approximately a million dollars in additional local aid to each of the towns in our district – our legislature voted overwhelmingly, along party lines, to keep the surplus on Beacon Hill. They spent that billion dollar surplus. Then they spent another billion dollars. Nobody should be surprised that we now find ourselves in a billion dollar fiscal hole. Our legislature dug this hole for us. The people are fed up with how our government handles our money, and they have a right to be. Many taxpayers look at Beacon Hill and see a supermajority that has absolute control and no sense of accountability. Their actions in 2000 and the squandering of last year’s surplus are only the most egregious evidence in support of that conclusion. I share that frustration, and will not be heard to tell those voters that their frustration is wrong, unjustified or irresponsible. The legislature’s actions in 2000 provide important context for Question One in another respect. In her release, my opponent says that passage of Question One will result “inevitably” in a whole series of adverse impacts on our cities and towns, including increased property taxes, decreased education funding, and so forth. Is that really so? Hardly – no more than the ballot measure passed in 2000 resulted “inevitably” in the similar parade of horribles trotted out in opposition to that initiative. Put simply: there is no reason to believe that having learned in 2000 that they can thumb their noses at the voters without electoral consequence, our legislature, now more thoroughly dominated by one party than it was in 2000, will choose this time to implement the will of the voters. On the other hand there are several reasons to believe they will do exactly the same thing they did eight years ago. In some contexts, my opponent’s rhetoric might be deemed “the politics of fear.” I’ll just call it political expediency. Either way, her rhetoric is overblown and her conclusions exaggerated. I have significant experience on Beacon Hill. Having seen and fought through extraordinary legislative efforts to kill Melanie’s Bill in 2005, I know first-hand how the supermajority deals with issues they do not like. My opponent suggests that it is the height of irresponsibility to view Question One as a vehicle to send a message to our legislature. But several months ago no less an authority on matters legislative than House Speaker Sal DiMasi characterized it as exactly that – a message vote. Further, the Speaker – who controls the legislative agenda on Beacon Hill with an iron fist – said of Question One: “I'm against doing it and I find myself hard-pressed to say that I would try to completely implement an elimination of the income tax…I can't see myself doing that in the future.” [Video of the Speaker’s comments can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzKcL6decG4] Just yesterday, WBZ-TV reported that legislative sources are telling their reporter that “if voters elect to abolish the state income tax, lawmakers on Beacon Hill will either vote to over-ride it or they will vote to delay it.” [http://wbztv.com/politics/state.income.tax.2.845987.html]This is an unfortunate state of affairs for reasons utterly unrelated to Question One; but it is our current political reality in this state. Our legislature does not feel responsible or accountable to the voters. Question one is a message vote. The message being sent is a necessary one, an overdue one, and one that will embarrass our legislative leadership and – hopefully – spur them to some degree of fiscal responsibility; but local services will not be eviscerated. The parade of horribles will not come marching down main street. I urge you, as voters, to make up your own minds on Question One. Even as a message vote, this is an important item on the ballot and ought to be considered carefully. I have shared my thinking and my conclusions, based both on our recent history and my experience on Beacon Hill, but I understand that opinions vary on this issue, as on many issues. Our legislature could use some of the healthy debate that is taking place in the public this election cycle. I look forward to the day when we have some balance in our legislature, and a return of open debate on Beacon Hill so that voters will not have to resort to radical measures like Question One to make their voices heard. Electing me to replace my friend Paul Loscocco, who has represented our district with integrity and independence, will represent a step towards that day, and I ask for your vote. Sincerely, Dan Haley |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor - For Dykema After a 22-year career in Republican politics, this year I will cast my vote for Carolyn Dykema, the Democratic candidate for State Representative for Holliston, Hopkinton, and parts of Medway, Southborough, and Westborough. This marks the first time I have publicly endorsed a Democrat in a partisan election. 1. The job requires collaboration and communication. The issues are complex; they deserve thought and discussion; they demand collaboration. It’s easy to say “no” and “cut” but answering “how and where” is hard. Carolyn Dykema has already demonstrated her ability to do this on some tough issues in her 10-year service to Holliston town government. Her opponent is offering trite rhetoric and no solutions. 2. Carolyn will be a full time state representative. This year, legislators met in formal session just 34 days and crammed 364 votes into those days. This arrangement makes it possible for someone to have a perfect attendance record and still work a job elsewhere. But the salary for a State Rep. is $58,000 (plus) which is equivalent to, or greater than, what a whole lot of hardworking people earn. So in my view, the complexity of the issues demands full time service; the salary justifies it. 3. We have enough lawyers on Beacon Hill. Carolyn Dykema has a degree in marketing and works in business. I think that’s refreshing! Check out her website http://www.dykemaforrep.com/Call her - she’ll be happy to talk to you. And please join me in voting for Dykema Nov 4th. Mary Greendale Holliston |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor REALLY WANT CHANGE ON BEACON HILL? VOTE GOP THIS YEAR This election season, the political talk is all about “change.” We certainly need it on Beacon Hill. But real and meaningful change in this Commonwealth’s government will never happen under one party rule. Otherwise, we just get more of the same. And what is more of the same in this state? The last Speaker of the House of Representatives resigned after being indicted. The current Speaker stands accused of doing political favors for his cronies. This past year a state representative somehow managed to casthis vote in the State House from the Caribbean. The Democrats who run the Registry of Probate offices in Cambridge and Boston are both under criminal investigation for stealing public funds. And owing to excessive generosity to political favorites, the state pension system is a time-bomb waiting to explode. In fact, public distrust of our state government runs so high in Massachusetts that its citizens estimate 41 cents of every dollar they pay in state taxes is wasted. Is it any wonder that there is a referendum on this year’s ballot that would completely do away with the state income tax? But there is also another option: vote Republican. The critical need to curb one party rule is especially pressing here in Metro-West. Last fiscal year, the taxpayers in the fourteen cities and towns that are included in the Middlesex- Worcester Senate District got back in state funding a mere fraction of every dollar they sent east to Beacon Hill. The remainder was gobbled up by the wards and precincts which are the loci of political power in this state. The Democratic Party leadership on Beacon Hill spends our taxes on venality, waste, and whatever other government inefficiencies are demanded by the political interests which keep them in power. And the state legislators who are supposed to represent us in this region too often turn a blind eye to this wretched mess in exchange for a few crumbs of aid and the passage of extravagant liberal social programs. In the tough economic times to come, this cannot continue. We will need to radically scale back government spending, and that means ending the waste and corruption in our state government’s operations. But we will not get anywhere so long as the entrenched political interests that control the State legislature block any efforts at meaningful reform. We must elect legislators who have the best interests of the state at heart, not that of their party’s leadership. We voters always complain that our politicians keep betraying the public trust. But then we keep re-electing them over and over again. This year you don’t have to accept more of the same. Vote Republican for a change. Brian P. Burke, Esq. Middlesex-Worcester State Committeeman 125 Birch Hill Rd. Stow, MA 01775 |
||||
|
Letters to the Editor - Magazines for Troops Dear Linda It is a great suggestion to donate magazines as well as articles needed or wanted by those serving our country. I noticed the partial list of suggested magazines and wondered if "lady magazines" should also be included. Your landscape photos are very good! Diane Beane From the editor: Yes, women's magazines can be included too. Magazines can be many types such as fishing, outdoors, vacation, travel, food, readers digests, prevention magazine, house and grounds magazines, computer, games, puzzle mags etc. Although the magazines get sent in a box with a soldier's name on it, they are ultimately passed around for everyone's enjoyment. |
||||
|
To the Editor
(an open letter to the voters of the Eighth
Middlesex District):
Last year, the
Supermajority that controls the House voted in overwhelming numbers against
a bill that would have
I am running to
bring a common-sense, independent voice to our Legislature, on behalf of the
Eighth Middlesex District. I hope you will take some time to learn more
about my candidacy at
www.danhaley2008.com. I look forward to the general election, and I ask
for your support and your vote in this Tuesday's primary and again in
November. |
||||
|
Letter to
the Editor: For Ed Mills |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Southville Fire Station closed Today I was driving home with my wife on Southville Road in Southborough. As we were driving by what had been Fire Station Number 2, I couldn't help but notice that the place was really being spruced up since the facilities department and recreation maintenance have moved in. There is new outside storage, the air raid siren cupola has been renovated, and the building is being painted. There are even several plantings on the side of the building. It really looks nice being cleaned up. I am also aware that several renovations have been made to the interior of the building to make the place quite comfortable. I would really take townie pride in all of this except for a few facts: This building was closed as a fire station because it wasn't worth putting money into, and staffing for the fire department was at risk and these folks working in this building were moved to Headquarters on Main Street. This building was erected in the early 1950's, and had a rather poor maintenance plan. It was renovated by department members a few times. Retired Chief Peter Phaneuf made it more economical by adding oil heat to the apparatus bays, and by increasing the size of the sleeping quarters to two rooms to accommodate anyone working there. He also replaced the overhead doors with larger doors to accommodate modern apparatus. Since this time, there has been constant debate over repairing the building, which had several structural problems, and of course, staffing. Staffing needs were outlined in a study several years ago, which the town has yet to fully accept. I guess my gripes are this: The fire department wasn't allowed to sink money into the building, yet the departments who have since moved into it have really done a nice job of fixing things up. Oh, there is still a fire engine in quarters, but no firefighters work there. And of course staffing has yet to be updated to the maximum recommendation. All the while, the residents who live on the south side of town must tolerate the fact that the closest station is closed, and must wait for help from Headquarters. Supposedly response times have not been diminished, however with all of the increased traffic we see, and with an aging housing stock and aging population, maybe the town should finish this building and put the firefighters back where they belong. Perhaps I sound a bit biased. I am. I live on the south side of town, and worked in that building for a lot of years before I retired from the Southborough Fire Department. I think the Board of Selectmen should take another look at this. John Kendall Southborough |
||||
|
Boston– The Political Action Committee of the Massachusetts Women’s Political Caucus announced today that it is endorsing candidate Carolyn Dykema, of Holliston, for State Representative for the 8th Middlesex District. “Carolyn Dykema has been an active and dedicated member of her community for many years. She is dedicated, enthusiastic, and possesses an understanding of the issues facing her district, which are critical in this election. She is, by far, the best choice for Representative in the 3rd Middlesex District,” said Executive Director Sheila Capone-Wulsin. “We applaud her candidacy, and we look forward to working with her on our shared agenda for Massachusetts women and families. For more than 35 years, the MWPC has been advocating for equal pay, social justice, and reproductive rights. We are excited to have an ally in Carolyn Dykema.” Carolyn Dykema lives in Holliston with her husband, Bill and three children. She has displayed a strong commitment to her community through her work as the Chairwoman for the Holliston Planning Board and on the Executive Board of the Metrowest Growth Management Committee. "The MWPC has activly supported so many of Massachusetts' top female
candidates,” said Dykema. “I am very pleased to have their endorsement and
honored to be included in their About the MWPC The Massachusetts Women’s Political Caucus was founded in 1971 for the purpose of increasing the number of women elected to public office and public policy positions and increasing the participation of women of all ages in the political process. More information about the MWPC is available online at www.mwpc.org. More information about Carolyn Dykema is available online at www.dykemaforrep.com. |
||||
|
Dear Editor: On Sunday, June 1st, the Southborough Gardeners held a Kitchen and Garden Tour. Eight of the club members and friends opened their homes and/or gardens to the public with the proceeds from the tour going to future Town Beautification projects. The gardeners wish to thank the individuals who spent their afternoon with us. We were gratified by the compliments we received and happy you were pleased with our efforts. In addition, we would like to give special recognition to the following local businesses who sponsored this event. We appreciate the part they played in making our tour successful. We hope the citizens of Southborough will support these businesses as they have supported us. Ancient Wisdom Healing Arts Country Gourmet English Garden Florist Every Body Balance, Inc. Gourmet Eros Pizza and Deli Gulbankian Farms Garden Center & Florist Shop Mauro’s Market Morris Funeral Home Middlesex Savings Bank Phaidra Nail Salon Polar Beverages Roche Brothers Salon Charisma Shrubs and Trees Southborough Dental Associates Southborough House of Pizza Southborough Medical Group Tempting Interiors, Inc. Tomasso, Tratorria, Inc. Chris Wraight Wee Care for Little People, Inc. Thank you all for a fantastic day. Susan Conti and Judy Quinlan—Chairwomen of the Kitchen and Garden Tour Amy Coombs—President of the Southborough Gardeners The Southborough Gardeners |
||||
|
Letters to the editor Linda – I’d like to extend a sincere Thank You very much - for your coverage of the Memorial Day Observance. For some reason – the local newspapers just don’t find it newsworthy enough to cover the observance in Southborough or other towns for that matter. We certainly appreciate and enjoy the photos you take and post to this terrific web site. I would like to clear up some things though. During the ceremony on Monday – I neglected to acknowledge some people who deserve recognition for their contributions. So… To Tom Lowell and his helpers from Troop 92 who moved our PA system and cooler of water from location to location –THANK YOU very much. To Dean Lewis at Fay School – who once again provided the collation at the Legion Post following our observances – THANK YOU. I can truly state that the Veterans enjoy the sandwiches. To Dick Varney and Charlie Hamel who helped placed the flags at the All Wars Memorial and Revolutionary War Cemetery – THANKS again. You two are the extra hands every time I’ve asked… I certainly appreciate you rising early to get the job done. To Lisa Braccio, family and friends – Who orchestrated the seventh Care Package Drive for the Troops recently. Nearly 400 packages – totaling over 8200 pounds of well received and much appreciated items for those serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. Another job WELL DONE… Thank You for caring so much for our men and women. There are many more – but these fine folks deserve a little extra thanks for all they do. Finally – To the citizens who joined us Monday on Memorial Day to remember those who have served our country and gave the ultimate sacrifice. THANK YOU. Many have forgotten the true meaning of this day – It’s nice to see that there are still those who understand its significance. THANK YOU all. Steve Whynot SK1 – USNR-Ret Commander VFW Post 3276 |
||||
|
Letters to the editor Linda: I would like to add Steve Whynot's name to the list of people that make these observances possible: Steve Whynot, himself, deserves enormous credit for all of his work during the year and particularly on the Memorial Day and Veterans' Day observances. Steve organizes and directs the placing of the flags at the cemeteries and on the flag poles on Main Street. Additionally, he organizes and arranges for the weapons, the ammunition, the the firing squad, the Militia company, many of the refreshments and many of the countless other details that make the observances go smoothly. The main thing is the planning that is necessary and Steve does most of the planning flawlessly and without fanfare. All the Vets owe him a tribute and a large measure of thanks. John Wilson, Commander, American Legion |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor May 7, 2008 - In this day of grid-lock and need for transportation alternatives, Southborough has the opportunity to make an important change. Presently, we are affiliated with the Worcester Regional Transit Authority. Yet we lay amidst the newly-formed Metro-West Regional Transit Authority. Not only will they cross our borders to meet the needs of member communities, they could help us meet ours along the way, perhaps more affordably. They offer door to door services, as well as Handicap-accessible options, too. They benefit our seniors, commuting students, and those who just want to leave the car at home. Voting “NO” on May 12th to the Worcester Transit Authority would free us to change our membership to a more relevant source. It can give us a “louder” voice in meeting the transportation needs of Southborough residents. Karen Challen |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Recognition Request for Four Southborough Young Men We hear so many bad things about the youth of today. I want to tell you about 4 Southborough young men who have been very courageous and have done the right thing. When children do the right thing, they should be recognized. There are two tragedies that occurred in the General Henry Knox Road neighborhood in the last three months and three of the young men live in the neighborhood. The first occurred on October 6, 2007. Six-year-old Patrick McAuliffe was riding his bike with his mother, Regina, on Middle Road on their way to see Patrick’s father, Tom McAuliffe, referee the St. Mark’s football game. Regina’s bike went off the road and crashed causing a severe head injury. Patrick, a cub scout, had a 5-point plan of how he was going to help his mother. First, he lifted the bike off her. Next, he looked in her pockets for her cell phone, but couldn’t find one. Then, he started yelling for help. Two young men riding their bikes nearby came to the rescue. Theo Balabanis, age 14 and his friend, Drew Theran, called 911 and stayed with Patrick until help came. They were brave and helped calm Patrick. Regina had the most severe head injury, requiring emergency surgery, along with swelling to her whole right side. She was in a coma for 16 days at Umass Medical Center, then moved to Spaulding Rehab and continues her recovery since coming home the day before Thanksgiving. She returns to Spaulding for therapy 3 days a week and has more upcoming surgery. She is probably alive today due to the quick reactions of these boys. On December 13, 2007 this same boy, Theo Balabanis, didn’t see his Dad, Ernie Balabanis, waiting at school during the early release, so he continued home on the bus. When his Dad wasn’t at the bus stop location, where they normally met everyday, Theo continued home to find his Dad lying on the garage floor! Theo was very upset, and yelled for help to Stephanos Bacon, age 14, who had continued walking home from the same bus stop. Stephanos came running. Steph told Theo to call 911 and Steph looked for a pulse and performed CPR until help arrived. A neighbor, Ann Rosseel, came with a blanket. Another neighbor, Keith Petry, offered to help. Steph, a boy scout, was extremely compassionate and kind to Theo and stayed with him until the ambulance came. He handled everything calmly and completely. Unfortunately, Ernie had passed away due to cardiopulmonary arrest that morning. These 4 young men, 6-year old Patrick McAuliffe, 14-year old Theo Balabanis, 15-year old Drew Theran, and 14-year old Steph Bacon should be recognized. In a world where we often expect to hear stories of the missteps of youth, these 4 young men represent the finest examples of courage, compassion, and friendship. We, in our neighborhood, are very proud of them all. Linda Petry Southborough, MA |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Isabella Dianne Sivert was born February 22, 2006 to my cousin Jeff and his wife Jen. At first, every thing seemed to be normal. Jen thought she looked just like her big brother Max! However, shortly after birth, Isabella was diagnosed with cardiac problems. Jen, a nurse in the cardiac unit at Children’s Hospital wrote the following when Isabella first went to Children's Hospital. “I always prayed going into work that I would just work there and take care of other people's children and that mine would never need to be a patient there. My biggest fear had come true.” In 2006 one of my sponsor's for my Boston Children's Hospital run wrote that “Little Isabella is surely running the mightiest marathon.” Sadly, Isabella’s marathon ended May 1, 2007 when she “earned her angel wings.” At Isabella’s funeral— her name still visible where I had written it in black sharpie ink down my leg for the marathon only two weeks earlier—her father, Jeff, told me that he wanted to run the Boston Marathon in the spring of 2008 with me and for Children’s Hospital. I agreed to help him train and to run the Boston Marathon in Isabella’s memory. Children’s Hospital was a central part of Isabella’s life. It gave her 14 months for her family to spend with her and to love her. In her short life, Bella brought together so many people. It is truly incredible how she inspired us all. It is my hope that running for Children’s again this year, will give another child the same kind of care that Isabella received, and therefore another family the joy of having that child in their lives. For two years I ran the Boston Marathon in honor of Isabella. These experiences have been some of the most rewarding I have ever had. The marathon will always hold a special place for me, as it will always remind me of Isabella and how strong she was and how hard she fought. It will also always remind me of all the incredibly generous people who have supported and sponsored me, for you too have also been such a part of these marathons. The 2008 Boston Marathon is fast approaching, so help me reach my goal of $1500 by April 21st! I could not have finished the marathon last year without thinking of her and all of my sponsors. You can sponsor me: Go to the following URL: You can mail me a check to: Amanda Watters 17 Wood St. Southborough, MA 01772 Please make all checks payable to Children’s Hospital Boston. Thank you, Amanda |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor We Must Do A Better Job Protecting Our Water Supplies You may have found the recent articles about pharmaceuticals in the drinking water supplies of 24 major metropolitan areas throughout the United States disturbing or shocking and wondered how safe your water is. The major way for drugs to get into our drinking water is from wastewater flowing into the source. While the watersheds of the reservoirs supplying the MWRA communities are not impacted by wastewater treatment plant discharges, little is really known about smaller municipal systems with local wells. The findings of the various pharmaceuticals being in the range of parts-per-billion are not believed to be harmful to humans while fish and wildlife are already showing adverse effects from drug contamination in the waterways. The region of the Upper Sudbury River, whose waters eventually flow through a number of towns, has remained free of effluent discharges from wastewater treatment plants. This may change over the next few years if appeals of the permits issued by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to the Town of Hopkinton fail and the wastewater treatment plant is built on the edge of the Whitehall Brook, which is classified as an Outstanding Resource Water of the Commonwealth, and is a tributary to the Sudbury River. The Massachusetts DEP has technically classified the treatment plant as a ground discharge facility although the discharge will be less than 200 feet from the brook. Ironically DEP funded studies done by the Unites States Geological Survey, which describe the problems caused by siting ground discharge treatment plants near water bodies while also pointing to the cost-benefits from properly locating these facilities on more distant uplands reducing the costs of treatment. With more than 70% of the state’s waters impaired by some form of pollution properly sited and monitored ground discharge facilities could help improve the quality of the state’s surface waters. This benefit remains questionable however with the existing level of oversight provided by the Department of Environmental Protection. The most recent DEP statistics show that in 2007 47.8% of the permitted ground discharge facilities in the state were in non-compliance with the terms of their permits. Allowed to continue, this lack of historical regulatory enforcement combined with a permit approval process managed with the goal to eliminate public input, the potential benefit of ground discharge treatment plants will be lost. ____________________________________________________________________________________
Why is this important? Please join the Cedar Swamp Conservation Trust and the Sudbury River Watershed Organization in urging DEP Commissioner Laurie Burt to prioritize the implementation of the appropriate regulations and procedures to correct these recurring agency problems and ensure the protection of the Commonwealth’s water supplies. John Craycroft , President Frederica Gillespie, Executive Director Cedar Swamp Conservation Trust Sudbury River Watershed Organization Westborough Southborough www.sudburyriver.org |
||||
|
Letters to the Editor
Hi, |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor
I read your wonderful essay on your mother.
How true it all is—the forgetting that escalates into loss for families.
It is difficult for all involved. There are programs that can help
families, including a 24/7 Helpline that is confidential and free Care
Consultation services to help plan for transitions. All of them can be
accessed through the Alzheimer’s Association at 800.272.3900. |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Dear Editor, On review of the proposed changes to Main Street by SEA I noted that they plan to relocate the stone walls around the Town Common. To my knowledge the wall was build in 1866 and is for the most part in it's original configuration. This represents a major piece of Southborough history. I am very opposed to relocating any aspect of this historic stone wall to make accommodations for traffic flow. There are a few things we should not mess with and this is one of them. Yours truly, Peter F. Phaneuf Southborough |
||||
|
Letter to the Editor Blue Star Flag
Please allow me to clear up a little confusion regarding the Blue Star Flag
that is currently flying at the All Wars. |
||||
|
Letter to the editor All Wars Memorial Over the course of the summer and fall I have been keeping an eye on the progress of the All Wars Memorial upgrade. Today while driving to Town Hall I stopped for another look. It sure is an awe inspiring thing to see. A real beauty of a monument. I hope that anyone who sees how things have turned out realize that we all owe a debt of gratitude not only to those whose names have been memorialized here, but also to Peter Phaneuf and friends for their countless hours working on this tremendous project. John Kendall Southborough |
||||
|
Letter to the editor Hillary not a good pick What all the political pundits are totally missing in the Hillary equation is that she is living a LIE! Everyone and anyone, male and female, KNOWS, that when you are in a relationship or marriage and your partner is unfaithful and you become acutely aware of that fact, initially your ego is wounded, but more importantly as you regain your equilibrium resentment begins to build and take hold and you realize that TRUST can NEVER be restored and if you choose to stay and continue to participate in that relationship, at the core of your being the truth IS ..that you not only no longer love that individual you in fact hate them. She has sold her soul to the DEVIL and we ALL know it!! How could we ever tolerate as a Nation a President with NO Soul !!! Her choice to stay with Bill has demonstrated that she is in fact WEAK, not Strong. Southborough, MA |
||||
 |
Dear
Editor,
